update thread

289, FIA & Daytona topics
Karl
Posts: 766
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Germany

Re: update thread

Post by Karl »

Nige, there are many, many types of filters, even the W 930 does have sub groups. Please check on the MANN website. Higher pressure could be a sign that your old filter had a low bypass rating. Additional hoses normally create more pressure . For me I do not like small filters, because the filtration area is small. The W 930 is a filter normally used in construction machinery and tractors, but the subgroup filters are also used in cars.
User avatar
StewbieC
T289R Committee
T289R Committee
Posts: 1361
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:50 pm
Location: out in the sticks, Shropshire

Re: update thread

Post by StewbieC »

peterc wrote:Stuart
Are you suggesting that Halfords = Fram as I have used Fram quite a lot over the years without seemly having any issues. I have used Halfords more recently due to not finding anything else readily available.
Peter C
I'm not suggesting that Halfords = Fram, but Fram filters are not going anywhere near my engine. Just google questions like "Are Fram filters any good" etc. You don't have to take my word for it. JMHO
________________________________________________
Stu
Hawk 289, 66 Mustang Fastback with a 289 maximum smiles per mile..
Paul Blore
Posts: 2077
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:20 pm
Location: Leicestershire, UK
Contact:

Re: update thread

Post by Paul Blore »

Can we try and keep this thread on track please. I the OP was for a list of upgrades that people have made to their cars rather than a detailed analysis of any specific component. :wink:

Thank you,
Paul
Johannes1
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:37 am

Re: update thread

Post by Johannes1 »

improving the exhaust system,
under the car
Image
new exhaust
Image
old exhaust
Image
now it looks a bit more original
Image
Johannes1
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:37 am

Re: update thread

Post by Johannes1 »

brake improving
MGB brake and shocks a bit poor in our times and traffic
Image
now it´s more efficant and better shocks
Image
Johannes1
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:37 am

Re: update thread

Post by Johannes1 »

improving the look of the engine bay
it´s a Rover engine
Image
and yes, it´s the same engine (looks better)
Image

now i start to save the money for.......??????

regards
Johannes
User avatar
Migge
Posts: 1984
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:51 pm

Re: update thread

Post by Migge »

215 instead of 289 sticker :)
Special customized BRA289
Johannes1
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:37 am

Re: update thread

Post by Johannes1 »

traitor - nobody would have noticed it :wink: :wink: :wink:
User avatar
Migge
Posts: 1984
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:51 pm

Re: update thread

Post by Migge »

Don't know which one I'll mount. But I made side emblems for the honest Cobra owner who has a Rover/Buick engine and no Ford :)

Image
Special customized BRA289
User avatar
peterc
T289R Member
T289R Member
Posts: 2056
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 9:05 am
Location: Surrey

Re: update thread

Post by peterc »

Johannes
Looking good.
Where did you get the HT lead clips from to attach to the Cobra rocker covers as I could do with those to keep my leads better positioned.
Next step is to improve the bonnet underside - assuming that you have a bulge you can make it look more like its riveted on by creating a hard edge to simulate the edge of the original bonnet.
Then there is the bracing between the scuttle and the front suspension.
I assume Migge that you are only expecting 240 bhp despite the 4 x IDF's as you are only 3.5L (215 ci). Mine being 4.6 ( 280 ci ) alledgely makes around 275.
Personally I would have kept quiet about the engine type. After all that immaculate work you have created a wonderful car so why spoil the illusion.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Post Reply