Radiator Dimensions
- Roger King
- Posts: 4396
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:29 pm
- Location: St Ives, Cambs
Re: Radiator Dimensions
James, basically the entire tubular structure at the front of the Hawk chassis is absent on the original. Therefore the radiator can sit completely in front of any part of the chassis at its full width. The structure is absent because the original has no upper wishbone mounts, as the transverse leafspring fulfills this function. Obviously the Hawk doesn’t have the spring, so needs wishbones.
- StewbieC
- T289R Committee
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:50 pm
- Location: out in the sticks, Shropshire
Re: Radiator Dimensions
About as close as you can get in a Hawk, it's never going to be original.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
________________________________________________
Stu
Hawk 289, 66 Mustang Fastback with a 289 maximum smiles per mile..
Stu
Hawk 289, 66 Mustang Fastback with a 289 maximum smiles per mile..
-
- T289R Member
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 11:13 pm
Re: Radiator Dimensions
Interesting Stu, must admit the engineer in me says the more upright radiator offers better cooling (unless properly ducted at an angle) - looks like a thick core, can you supply a drawing?
Kind Regards
James
Kind Regards
James
- Roger King
- Posts: 4396
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:29 pm
- Location: St Ives, Cambs
Re: Radiator Dimensions
Worth mentioning that the original radiator is a crossflow. It is fully shrouded at the top and fills the space between the inner wings.
-
- T289R Member
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 11:13 pm
Re: Radiator Dimensions
Yes indeed Roger, I noted that the Fluidyne one has tanks either side.....
- StewbieC
- T289R Committee
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:50 pm
- Location: out in the sticks, Shropshire
Re: Radiator Dimensions
Hi James,
sent you a mail.
sent you a mail.
________________________________________________
Stu
Hawk 289, 66 Mustang Fastback with a 289 maximum smiles per mile..
Stu
Hawk 289, 66 Mustang Fastback with a 289 maximum smiles per mile..
- Roger King
- Posts: 4396
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:29 pm
- Location: St Ives, Cambs
Re: Radiator Dimensions
Stu,
Did you get that Brise Fabrications rad to work? It's a while ago now but IIRC it had a siphon outlet at the bottom to allow a deeper matrix.
Did you get that Brise Fabrications rad to work? It's a while ago now but IIRC it had a siphon outlet at the bottom to allow a deeper matrix.
- StewbieC
- T289R Committee
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:50 pm
- Location: out in the sticks, Shropshire
Re: Radiator Dimensions
Hi Roger,
It wasn't big enough for the Ford V8 hence why I got Brise to make the bigger one that is now fitted and has worked fine for 4 years.
A chap who has a mild tuned Rover 3.5litre has that one now.
It wasn't big enough for the Ford V8 hence why I got Brise to make the bigger one that is now fitted and has worked fine for 4 years.
A chap who has a mild tuned Rover 3.5litre has that one now.
________________________________________________
Stu
Hawk 289, 66 Mustang Fastback with a 289 maximum smiles per mile..
Stu
Hawk 289, 66 Mustang Fastback with a 289 maximum smiles per mile..
- Roger King
- Posts: 4396
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:29 pm
- Location: St Ives, Cambs
Re: Radiator Dimensions
Just tried the photos again, with no success. Most of my car photos are 4000x3000 pixels, and the only way I can find of reducing them is to crop them, which renders them useless. I've tried saving them as around 3mb jpegs down to 350kb jpegs but this doesn't seem to affect the number of pixels.
It seems that if anyone needs photos for my posts, they'll need to pm me their email address and I'll send them separately. Weird - don't have a problem posting on any other forums.
I really don't understand now. I've just checked the photo I posted earlier in this thread, and that's 4032x3024. I clearly have a problem with this forum.
It seems that if anyone needs photos for my posts, they'll need to pm me their email address and I'll send them separately. Weird - don't have a problem posting on any other forums.
I really don't understand now. I've just checked the photo I posted earlier in this thread, and that's 4032x3024. I clearly have a problem with this forum.
- StewbieC
- T289R Committee
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:50 pm
- Location: out in the sticks, Shropshire
Re: Radiator Dimensions
Hi Roger,
Every photo I add as an attachment gets automatically scaled down. They are stored on my PC as up to 6MB pictures and I click on the attachment tab and it scales them automatically to less than 300k. Is it a Mac thing maybe? I use Windows 10 and no issues. This pic is 2Mb and I did nothing to it. Automatically resized to 167kb.
Andy can you advise?
Every photo I add as an attachment gets automatically scaled down. They are stored on my PC as up to 6MB pictures and I click on the attachment tab and it scales them automatically to less than 300k. Is it a Mac thing maybe? I use Windows 10 and no issues. This pic is 2Mb and I did nothing to it. Automatically resized to 167kb.
Andy can you advise?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
________________________________________________
Stu
Hawk 289, 66 Mustang Fastback with a 289 maximum smiles per mile..
Stu
Hawk 289, 66 Mustang Fastback with a 289 maximum smiles per mile..